Jamie Batenhorst Is Titled As A “Human Resource Generalist”

Jamie Batenhorst is titled as a â€Å"Human Resource Generalist† at Buckle’s corporate office. Through an interview, I was able to understand a bit more about the human resources department at Buckle and get a quick glimpse into how their corporation is run. Buckle is a retail clothing company that originated in Kearney, Nebraska. The corporation as grown nationally, having over 400 retail stores around the United States. Because the company started as a small clothing store, many changes have been made over the years. Included in those changes was the addition of a human resources department, added only within last 5 years. Up until such time, individual human resource functions were handled in each department that they loosely related to. I†¦show more content†¦All too often, misunderstandings happen due to technology. So for Jaime, being able to interpret a situation and respond in a way that is easily readily is very important. Another big part of her job i s training of managers. She said that she is constantly making phone calls to managers around the country working on their skills. â€Å"Role playing,† is the term Jaime used to describe what she does with store managers. She said that far too often managers are placed in situations where they are unsure how to handle in a way that the Buckle Corporation would want them to. By presenting managers with situation and asking them â€Å"how would you handle this?† it keeps the managerial teams proactive. She also mentioned that twice a year, all managers are asked to please come to Kearney for a formal evaluation and training weekend called â€Å"manager meetings.† This gives the generalists a chance to meet everyone face to face and get a feel for what they are actually like as a manager, rather than continuously having phone conversations. I did ask if is difficult not being able to evaluate the managers in person and see how things are run. She assured me that th e steps they take to talk with employees and managers on the phone are a big help. At manager meetings, individuals are graded on how they interact with others, how they respond to situations and tough questions, and how they present themselves. This give the Buckle human resource team insight as to how they are running

The Hunger Games The Book and The Film Comparison Free Essay Example, 750 words

THE HUNGER GAMES Introduction The hunger games is a book written by Suzanne Collins, who is an American television writer and a novelist best known for her New York Times bestselling series. The under land Chronicles and the Hunger Games. Suzanne was born on August 10, 1962 in Hartford, Connecticut in the United States. She studied at the Alabama School of Fine Arts, Indiana University Bloomington and has many awards from her writing career one from her novel The Hunger Games (Collins, 7) The Hunger Games novel was published in Oct 1st, 2008 by Scholastic printers. The book has 27 chapters and 394 pages. It talks about terrifying times in the future where people are forced to participate in a reality TV show that is taking place known as The Hunger Games. The event is being recorded to be aired so as to benefit the organizers commercially. The book talks about twenty-four boys and girls that are forced to participate in the Hunger Games that are cruel. The rule of the games is you either kill or be killed. The sister of a 16 year old Katniss has been selected to participate in the 74th hunger games in the Capital, the heart of Panem which is a new land that rose from the ruins of a post-apocalyptic North America. We will write a custom essay sample on The Hunger Games: The Book and The Film Comparison or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now The citizen in this area had rebelled against the rulers and to punish them, they are required to produce representatives from each district to participate in the Hunger Games where they fight to death (Collins, 7) Katniss identifies this as a death sentence for her sister and steps forward to take her place in the hope of saving her younger sister’s life. She sacrifices her life for that of the sister and relies on her survival skills to make it despite her fear of dying. Around 4.3 million copies of the book were sold retailing from $10 to $19 in 2008. The sales 9.2 million copies in 2010 and tripled in 2012. The book was rated five stars by 5253 people out of 6899 who read it 764 gave it four stars; 319 rated it three stars 230 rated it two stars and 333 rated it 1 star. The overall rating was 4.5.President snow plays a bigger role in the film than in the book. The president appears in several scenes within the film than in the book discussing the games with Seneca and observes the joyful arrival of Katniss back to the district. The movie also leaves out some minor characters from the book. One of a character is a girl who helped Katniss when she was preparing for the games. She regrets having not saved her after she was labeled a traitor, and her tongue cut off in the book. This is however not brought out in the movie. Finally, the movie changes some of the scenes such as the murder of the Thresh by Cato after helping Katniss. The movie stages this as from wild dogs brought into the game by the organizers to help eliminate the participants. The book, however, puts Thresh’s murder as the work of Cato to help the author stage down the final show between Katniss and Cato. The movie the Hunger Games film was released in 2012 and was based on the novel. The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. The movie was directed by Gary Ross and produced by Nina Jacobson. The film has the same storyline as the novel apart from a few changes. The film takes place in Dystopian, which is a post-apocalyptic future in the nation of Panem same as the book. Girls and boys between the age of 12 and 18 participate in Hunger Games by fighting to death. The games are televised and end when only one participant remains. The film was released on March 21, 2012 in France and the US on March 23, 2012 in the IMAX theaters (Collins, 7)The film earned a gross of $67.3 million on the opening day and $152.5 million on the weekend. It remained in the first place at the North American box office for four consecutive weekends. It had a worldwide gross income of $691 million against its budget of $78 million making it the 3rd highest earning film in the US and 9th worldwide 7,434,058 DVDs of the film were sold making it the best-selling DVD in 2012. Out of 591,878 votes cast, the movie was rated 7.3/10. The changing of some of the scene is important for the visual form is important so as to captivate the people to watch the film. This helps to get more sales despite it being the same story that the people read in the book. As observed, the visual form of hunger games generated more gross income than the print form. The sales of the book are 4.3 million copies in the first year as compared to those of the DVD, which were 7,434,058 proving that people preferred the visual form of the same. Conclusion Both print and visual versions complement each other. For example, the visual version of hunger games led to the rise in sales of the print version. Therefore, both mediums should be well utilized to maximize sales and enable reach a large audience. Works Cited Collins, Suzanne. The Hunger Games. New York: Scholastic, 2008. Print.

Our Mutual Friend Free Essays

Wider Reading Books Research: Name: Our Mutual Friend Author: Charles Dickens Synopsis: The multiple plots of Our Mutual Friend, Dickens’s last complete novel, twine around the miser John Harmon’s legacy of profitable heaps of refuse (â€Å"dust†). Harmon dies and leaves the dustheap operation to his estranged son John, on the condition that he marries Bella Wilfer, a young woman unknown to him. When a body found in the Thames is believed to be the younger Harmon, travelling home to receive his inheritance, the dustheaps descend instead to Harmon’s servant Noddy Boffin (â€Å"The Golden Dustman†). We will write a custom essay sample on Our Mutual Friend or any similar topic only for you Order Now Boffin and his wife respond to their new status by hiring Silas Wegg, a â€Å"literary man with a wooden leg† to teach Boffin to read; arranging to adopt an orphaned toddler from his poor great-grandmother; and bringing the socially ambitious Bella Wilfer into their home, where she is watched and evaluated by John Rokesmith, a mysterious young man employed as Boffin’s secretary. Rokesmith is actually John Harmon, who has survived betrayal and attempted murder and is living incognito so that he can observe Bella. Boffin’s negative transformation by his wealth, Bella’s moral awakening as she witnesses the changes wealth produces in Boffin and in herself, and the developing love relationship between Rokesmith and Bella form one key sub-plot. Another is the romance between gentlemanly idler Eugene Wrayburn and Lizzie Hexam, the daughter of the waterman who finds the drowned body. Class differences and the obsessive love and jealousy of schoolmaster Bradley Headstone threaten their relationship, but they are finally married with the help of the crippled dolls’ dressmaker Jenny Wren. The smaller plots that interweave these sensation/romance narratives comment on the hypocrisy of fashionable life (â€Å"Podsnappery†) and the destruction of the family lives of both rich and poor by an industrialized, materialistic society. Characters: John Harmon, Bella Wilfer, Noddy Boffin, Mrs Henrietta Boffin, Lizzie Hexam, Charley Hexam, Eugene Wrayburn. Themes: One of the most prevalent symbols in Our Mutual Friend is that of the River Thames, which becomes part of one of the major themes of the novel, rebirth and renewal. Water is seen as a sign of new life, used by churches during the sacrament of Baptism as a sign of purity and a new beginning. In Our Mutual Friend, it has the same meaning. Characters like John Harmon and Eugene Wrayburn end up in the waters of the river, and come out reborn as new men. Wrayburn emerges from the river on his deathbed, but is ready to marry Lizzie to save her reputation. Of course, he surprises everyone, including himself, when he survives and goes on to have a loving marriage with Lizzie. John Harmon also appears to end up in the river through no fault of his own, and when Gaffer pulls his â€Å"body† out of the waters, he adopts the alias of John Rokesmith. This alias is for his own safety and peace of mind; he wants to know that he can do things on his own, and does not need his father’s name or money to make a good life for himself. [29] Throughout Our Mutual Friend, Dickens uses many descriptions that relate to water. Some critics refer to this as â€Å"metaphoric overkill,† and indeed there are numerous images described by water that have nothing to do with water at all. [30] Phrases such as the â€Å"depths and shallows of Podsnappery,† [31] and the â€Å"time had come for flushing and flourishing this man down for good† [31] show Dickens’s use of watery imagery, and help add to the descriptive nature of the book. Historical Background: Our Mutual Friend was published in nineteen monthly numbers in the fashion of many earlier Dickens novels and for the first time since Little Dorrit (1855–7). A Tale of Two Cities (1859) and Great Expectations (1860–1) had been serialized in Dickens’s weekly magazine All the Year Round. Dickens remarked to Wilkie Collins that he was â€Å"quite dazed† at the prospect of putting out twenty monthly parts after more recent weekly serial. Our Mutual Friend was the first of Dickens’s novels not illustrated by Hablot Browne, with whom he had collaborated since The Pickwick Papers (1836–7). Dickens instead opted for the younger Marcus Stone and, uncharacteristically, left much of the illustrating process to his discretion. After suggesting only a few slight alterations for the cover, for instance, Dickens wrote to Stone: â€Å"All perfectly right. Alterations quite satisfactory. Everything very pretty† Stone’s encounter with a taxidermist named Willis provided the basis for Dickens’s Mr. Venus, after Dickens had indicated he was searching for an uncommon occupation (â€Å"it must be something very striking and unusual†) for the novel. How to cite Our Mutual Friend, Papers

Nature Vs. Nurture A Debate Within Psychology Example For Students

Nature Vs. Nurture : A Debate Within Psychology There s a debate within psychology about whether certain aspects of behavior are genetic or learned characteristics. Certain physical characteristics are genetic, like color of eyes, hair type, and skin color. Other things like driving, talking, or tying your shoes are learned. People wonder if personality and mental abilities are genetic or learned. There are good arguments for both the nurture, and nature side of these three issues: intelligence, personality, and homosexuality. The process of genetically inheritance is the transmission of traits from parents to offspring. Each cell in the body has 23 pairs of chromosomes and one chromosome from each pair is inherited from the mother and one from the father into the child. Mutations in the DNA code causes different forms of genes to appear in the offspring. People genetically inherit their facial features, some diseases, instincts, and some would argue their sexuality, personality, or intelligence. Sexual desires, along with sleeping and facial recognition, are said to be instincts. Learned traits are behavioral traits that a person is taught to have for their environment and survival needs. They re usually forced onto the person to improve survival or to fit in. The most accepted theory is that most of a person s behavior is a result of their environment. Instincts are known since birth and contradict some things that are thought to be a learned trait.According to Jennifer Smith in the article â€Å"Waking Up from the American Dream,† â€Å"One s intelligence, in a very real sense, is simply a matter of luck. One is born with it and can only gainMark 2so much through effort.† People relate someone innovative usually to have a high level ofintelligence. When background checks are given to the person the influences of nature versusnurture are brought up. The argument is whether intelligence is learned or is one born with theirintelligence. Today most psychologist recognized that human intelligence is formed by both genetic factors and their environm ent. Those who argue that intelligence is hereditary would say a who developed early skills quickly were born smart. They d say an average person wouldn t be able to achieve the greatness someone like Albert Einstein could. Evidence of genetic influences include: â€Å"Twin studies suggest that identical twins IQ s are more similar than those of fraternal twins† (Promin Spinath, 2004). and, â€Å"Siblings reared together in the same home have IQ s that are more similar than those of adopted children raised together in the same environment† (McGue others, 1993). The idea of nature in intelligence was strongly rejected by early modern philosophers. If two parents with very high IQs have a child with a very low IQ, it s most likely due to genetic mutation. There are many environmental influences that are said to influence intelligence, the biggest being family and education. If a child has a home life that encourages learning they usually are of higher intelligence than a child not in that type of home. A person s access to education also determines their intelligence level, and usually the more education they have the more intelligent they are. Anup Shah, in the article â€Å"Causes of Poverty,† on the website GlobalIssue, claims, â€Å"Children raised in poverty tend to miss school more often because of illness.† Nutrition affects intelligence throughout a human lifespan. Proper nutrition establishes aMark 3base for future intellectual development. Stress also plays a part in human intelligence. There smany prenatal factors that can cause developmental delays.The development of personality is another part of the nature versus nurture debate. The argument is whether personality traits are more hereditary than influenced by their environment. One s personality is their combination of qualities that make their character.It s often easy to see similarities between a child s personality and it s parents. But it seems that the child s personality has developed from it s parent s influences. Some people would say they got their short-temper from their parents or everyone in their family exhibits the same type of interests. It s hard to tell if the child s personality traits are influenced from being around their parents or are hereditary. In twin studies identical twins if environmental factors are the same, the only thing that can make identical twins more similar than fraternal twins is their greater genetic similarity. 40% of identical twins personality is hereditary. When children exhibit certain behaviors that neither parent demonstrates can be argued that nature plays a role in the development of the child s personality. When people are around another person a lot they tend to display traits that that other person displays. If a nice child is abused by a parent they can start to become more aggressive and violent later in their life. The United States government has spent billions in genetic research and the current evidence seem to show that we don t have genes for our personality. Personality is not determined by any single gene but by may genes working together. Even working together genes are not powerful enough to control or create one s personality. The genetic factors work with the environmental factors to create personality.Mark 4The debate about homosexuality and whether it s a result of nature or nurture has beengoing on for a long time. It has taken even greater importance now because it s become so widelydebated throughout the world . With some places making it legal for gay marriage and some places making it not legal. People are trying to fight for the homosexual s right to have the same rights and marriage benefits of a regular married couple. There s been compromises trying to give them some of the same rights but not all. Some people think homosexuality is a biological factor. They think it s as much of a choice as one s race is. They think nature is responsible for a person to become a homosexual. Some of the strongest evidence that people are born gay is based on the fraternal birth order effect. Researchers calculate that about 15 to 30 percent of gay men have the fraternal birth order effect. Several studies have shown that men with older biological brothers are likelier to be gay than men with older sisters or no older siblings. The likelihood of being gay increases by 33 percent with each older brother. Scientist haven t been able to prove much else for the reason some people may be homosexual. Some people claim no one would choose to be gay and go through all the ridicule they go through. With such an anti-homosexual society they d rather be straight, but they cannot control who they develop feelings for and who they find attractive.Other people believe homosexuality is a choice or the result o f something negatively affecting a p erson. Some say sexual orientation is not like an instinct. People become homosexual through life experiences and the influences around them. Some homosexuals admit to figuring out they rather be in bed with a man over a women later in life through their own experiences. Some people believe homosexuals have the choice to leave the lifestyle. They say dating andMark 5marriage doesn t magically happen and that we choose the life we want to live and who we wantto live that life with. Some people think others become homosexual if they re raped as a boy.Those people say being homosexual is all about the sex. The nurture versus nature arguments for most topics are very controversial and both don t really have any proof to say whether one is right over the other. One might have more information, or make a bigger argument than the other but there s no proof to prove the other wrong. For me it s hard to choose a side in any of these arguments. It s hard to choose a side when there s not any 100% proof the other is wrong. My opinions lead towards the nurture side for most of the topics. Nature vs Nurture don t have exact proof for the other to be wrong but both pose a good stance and argument against the other.